[dsdave]

I've recently acquired this from a friend and am looking to sell it.



Basic Information
The document is titled "Iranian Regime Survival Strategies and Asymmetric Retaliation Options Following Leadership Decapitation in Operation Epic Fury."
It is an intelligence assessment by the Near East Mission Center within the CIA.
It was drafted on March 3rd, 2026.
The document ID is IA-26-012 and it's 13 pages (including cover & 1 blank page) long.

Classification
The document has an overall classification of TOP SECRET//GLOBALPOINT/HCS-P/SI-G/TK//ORCON/NOFORN. The following is a brief explanation for each:

TOP SECRET: Highest level of classification in the US

GLOBALPOINT: Classified compartment housing intelligence derived from recent US operations in Iran
HCS-P: HUMINT Control System - Product; compartment used to protect finished intelligence derived from human sources
SI-G: Special Intelligence - Gamma; compartment for exceptionally sensitive signals intelligence
TK: Talent Keyhole; control system used to protect intelligence products derived from overhead collection systems

ORCON: Originator Controlled; dissemination control marking indicating that the originating agency must approve further distribution
NOFORN: Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals; dissemination marking indicating the information cannot be shared with non-U.S. citizens or foreign governments

Description
This document...

• lists several options available for the Iranian regime after Operation Epic Fury
  
• tracks Iranian military/proxy activities in the following days
  
• tracks internal factional dispute that is delaying operatioal pace
  
• predicts likely trajectory of behavior over the following 3 weeks
  
• outlines long-term implications for the US
  
• assesses intelligence gaps in the IC.
  

It's pretty sensitive with contents of private conversations between the US and 2 allies, intel from 2 high-level sources within the Iranian government, and more.

Payment & Delivery
The price is US$4,599 and I will only accept Monero (XMR) for payment.
Escrow is mandatory. Beastmode from Patched or forum escrow is preferred.
Upon payment, the document will be delivered via OnionShare over TOR.
You will receive the link and the password on Session.

Contact
Please contact ONLY if you're interested/willing to buy.
I can provide up to 2 additional pages (redacted) for sample upon request.
Please don't bitch about the document being not valuable enough or needing to see an unredacted page.

Session: 05a78e33848a265f2d2a49781d1d0205bb9243b3582db0105f3da09e9a9c1daf4c

TERMS OF SERVICE (READ!)
https://rentry.co/w6ctgxsy

[dsdave]

bumpppp

[yanfire12345]

This doc is ridiculously fake,from classification markings to cover colors, from declassification date to warning section, everything is wrong.

[dsdave]

This doc is ridiculously fake,from classification markings to cover colors, from declassification date to warning section, everything is wrong.

Please don't accuse me of anything before you post actual specific evidence. I can back myself because I know what I'm selling.

[yanfire12345]

This doc is ridiculously fake,from classification markings to cover colors, from declassification date to warning section, everything is wrong.

Please don't accuse me of anything before you post actual specific evidence. I can back myself because I know what I'm selling.

Ah… my friend, please, stop this arguing already.

I even know where this fake document team is coming from. Is it maybe through one organization starting with “L”? Or maybe some person whose name starts with “N,K”? I only say one thing. the marking for signals intelligence is not “si-g,” this is wrong, completely wrong. Second, this document, it looks like talking about trend analysis and internal decisions of allies… so tell me, what this has to do with signals intelligence, hmm?
There are also many other mistakes, but I do not want to point out every single one, I am not your teacher.
In the end, you tell your team behind you,go study more in this area?

[dsdave]

This doc is ridiculously fake,from classification markings to cover colors, from declassification date to warning section, everything is wrong.

Please don't accuse me of anything before you post actual specific evidence. I can back myself because I know what I'm selling.

Ah… my friend, please, stop this arguing already.

I even know where this fake document team is coming from. Is it maybe through one organization starting with “L”? Or maybe some person whose name starts with “N,K”? I only say one thing. the marking for signals intelligence is not “si-g,” this is wrong, completely wrong. Second, this document, it looks like talking about trend analysis and internal decisions of allies… so tell me, what this has to do with signals intelligence, hmm?
There are also many other mistakes, but I do not want to point out every single one, I am not your teacher.
In the end, you tell your team behind you,go study more in this area?

Lol I know neither the organization nor the person you're talking about. Mind telling me their full names?

I'd also like to know why you'd think SI-G is "completely wrong." I assume you're thinking about SI (by the way, which is an abbreviation for "special intelligence" not "signals intelligence"). With a simple google search, you'd see that SI-G is a sub-compartment of SI with G (GAMMA) added for highly sensitive communication intercepts. You don't have to take me for my words. Out of many examples, the congressional report for the Snowden leak (which can also be found with a simple search) also uses this in its classification banner.

As for your second point, this document is an assessment. It would obviously require intelligence to know how the Iranians are reacting and what their future plans would be.

I'd like to read you're other points, if you have any, preferably ones that aren't obviously untrue.

---

This doc is ridiculously fake,from classification markings to cover colors, from declassification date to warning section, everything is wrong.

Please don't accuse me of anything before you post actual specific evidence. I can back myself because I know what I'm selling.

Ah… my friend, please, stop this arguing already.

I even know where this fake document team is coming from. Is it maybe through one organization starting with “L”? Or maybe some person whose name starts with “N,K”? I only say one thing. the marking for signals intelligence is not “si-g,” this is wrong, completely wrong. Second, this document, it looks like talking about trend analysis and internal decisions of allies… so tell me, what this has to do with signals intelligence, hmm?
There are also many other mistakes, but I do not want to point out every single one, I am not your teacher.
In the end, you tell your team behind you,go study more in this area?

Lol I know neither the organization nor the person you're talking about. Mind telling me their full names?

I'd also like to know why you'd think SI-G is "completely wrong." I assume you're thinking about SI (by the way, which is an abbreviation for "special intelligence" not "signals intelligence"). With a simple google search, you'd see that SI-G is a sub-compartment of SI with G (GAMMA) added for highly sensitive communication intercepts. You don't have to take me for my words. Out of many examples, the congressional report for the Snowden leak (which can also be found with a simple search) also uses this in its classification banner.

As for your second point, this document is an assessment. It would obviously require intelligence to know how the Iranians are reacting and what their future plans would be.

I'd like to read you're other points, if you have any, preferably ones that aren't obviously untrue.

Oh and with evidence, please

[dsdave]

bumppp

[RoanokeYehia]

This doc is ridiculously fake,from classification markings to cover colors, from declassification date to warning section, everything is wrong.

Please don't accuse me of anything before you post actual specific evidence. I can back myself because I know what I'm selling.

Ah… my friend, please, stop this arguing already.

I even know where this fake document team is coming from. Is it maybe through one organization starting with “L”? Or maybe some person whose name starts with “N,K”? I only say one thing. the marking for signals intelligence is not “si-g,” this is wrong, completely wrong. Second, this document, it looks like talking about trend analysis and internal decisions of allies… so tell me, what this has to do with signals intelligence, hmm?
There are also many other mistakes, but I do not want to point out every single one, I am not your teacher.
In the end, you tell your team behind you,go study more in this area?

To be honest, I think you should provide more arguments to support this point.